
Resource Centers:(News, information, and tools to support your practice)
Aromatherapy » Career Development » Education and Certification » Green Living » Liability Insurance » Techniques »
Online Exclusives » Conventions and Events » Laws & Legislation » Massage Associations » Schools/Training » Self-Care » Reader Expressions » Research » Link Partners » Donate to Research »
Researchers at Osaka University in Japan have found that spa bathing has a moderate effect on stress relief.
According to the authors of the study, “Change in Salivary Physiological Stress Markers by Spa Bathing,” spa and sauna bathing have been shown to produce positive physiological effects in previous studies. In this study, the stress-relief effects of spa bathing were assessed by measuring two sensitive salivary stress markers, cortisol and chromogranin A (CgA). Cortisol, a hormone produced by the adrenal glands, is secreted in response to stress. CgA is a protein, also secreted by the adrenal glands, and is measured as an index of physiological stress.
Twelve male university students participated in this study. They bathed for 60 minutes in a local spa, which had an average water temperature of 107.6°F and a mineral composition of sodium and chloride. Saliva samples were collected immediately before and after the baths, and then again 30 minutes later. As a control measure, salivary samples were collected from the same individuals at the same time on another day.
Salivary cortisol
Although the mechanism was not pinpointed in this study, the authors suggest that the marker levels may have been modified by increased sympathetic activity in response to thermal stress. They conclude that these findings suggest spa bathing can provide moderate relief for people experiencing low or high stress.
Source: Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. Authors: Toda, M; Morimoto, K; Nagasawa, S; Kitamura, K. Originally published in Biomedical Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, February 2006, pp. 11–14.
Comments