Hospitals are
increasingly using massage and other complementary therapies.
Hospital massage therapist Karen Fink is profiled in the June 30 issue of
The Cleveland Plain Dealer newspaper.
"[Fink] believes that some of the appeal of
hands-on therapy is in the time a practitioner spends with a patient and in the importance of touch to healing," the newspaper notes. "'There's a real connection
with the practitioner, it's one-on-one, there's touch and nurturing,' she said."
The article also details the work of Fink's colleague, chiropractor Lori Christian, and mentions acupuncture as a remedy for low-back pain.
"Fink [and Christian] cite two main reasons that people are more satisfied with
hands-on treatments: because they are effective, and because more people today want drug-free pain treatment today," the newspaper notes.
Comments
Location: wilmington, nc
to begin with, "increased use" at hospital of massage, and other complementary therapies, is good news! indeed, have personally received praise from patients that my therapy (as well as that of my colleagues) has helped them "more than any other" during their stay in hosptital. for example, since the introduction of ambulatory surgery, acuity level of the hospital patient has concentrated and spiked-- because population is thicker for shorter lengths and thus in need of more focused care. yet "in-house" perception still suprisingly remains in infancy. otherwise we'd all be working towards better health care, hospital treatment, even preventive maintenance. "more studies" are being demanded. perhaps obama's health plan then will shift better foci towards the practicality of properly applied massage therapy towards betterment of every patient's hospital stay? after all this would obviously benefit everybody, "improving patient satisfaction" and, in turn, "profitability" that hospital industry (desperately) requires.