Massage Classification System
Researched
A major challenge in massage research is that
the terms used to describe massage treatments are not defined consistently,
according to a study published in the June 23, 2006, issue of BMC
Complementary and Alternative Medicine.
This problem affects the reliability and precision
of massage research. For example, “deep tissue” is interpreted
by some as neuromuscular therapy, and by others as Swedish massage
with added pressure. In an effort to create a common language for
massage researchers and practitioners, a collaboration of researchers
recently proposed a classification system for massage treatments.
“Development of a taxonomy to describe
massage treatments for musculoskeletal pain,” a literature
review, explored the massage treatment literature for musculoskeletal
pain, which consisted of 18 textbooks and three databases. The techniques
identified in the literature were discussed by a senior massage-therapist
educator and seven experienced massage therapists. Definitions for
these techniques were then established based on their mechanics
and applications.
What resulted is a classification system for
principal goals of treatment, styles and techniques. The four goals
of treatment identified by this study are relaxation massage, clinical
massage, movement re-education, and energy work. Examples of styles,
as defined in this study, are Swedish massage, myofascial release,
and Reiki. A total of 36 distinct techniques were identified and
described, many of which could be included in multiple styles. Examples
of techniques are kneading, rocking, and direction of energy.
The authors conclude that the standardized terminology
could help students, researchers and practitioners with clearer
communication about the nature of massage treatments.
The full text of the study is available at www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/6/24. |